This document is a compilation of all of the pages regarding rotating mechanical systems and is useful for printing.
Contents
Animation by Ames Bielenberg
This page describes the development of mathematical models of rotating mechanical systems, though some translate (move back and forth) as well. It is suggested that you read about translating mechanical systems first. Since many of the concepts involved with rotating systems are analogous to those in translating systems, many of the discussions in these pages will be brief.
A list of the fundamental units of interest is listed below. The next tab (above: "System Elements") gives a description of the building blocks of these system (inertia, spring and friction elements). This is followed by a description of methods to go from a drawing of a system to a mathematical model of a system in the form of differential equations ("Mathematical Model"). Methods for solving the equation are given elsewhere. The last section discusses topics relevant to energy storage and dissipation in these systems ("Energy Power").
This page does not discuss the solution of these equations, only the development of the equations through a physical model of the system.
The table below lists commonly used units of measure for Rotating
mechanical systems in SI units. More complete
tables are available.
| Fundamental Quantities | SI unit |
| Time - t | second (s) |
| Moment of Inertia - J | kilogram (kg-m²) |
| Angle - θ | radians (rad) |
| Torque - τ | Newton (N-m) |
| Energy - w | Joule (J) [W-s, N-m] |
| Power - p | Watt (W) [J/s] |
| Spring Constant - Kr | (N-m/rad) |
| Friction Coefficient - Br | (N-m-s/rad) |
© Copyright 2005-2013 Erik Cheever This page may be freely used for educational purposes.
Erik Cheever Department of Engineering Swarthmore CollegeContents
As with translating mechanical systems, there are three fundamental physical elements that comprise rotating mechanical system: inertia elements, springs and friction elements.
The quantities used in rotating systems are very similar to those in translating
systems. The table below lists the analogous quantities for rotating and translating
systems. The constitutive equations for inertial elements, springs and friction
elements follow.
| Rotating Systems | Translating Systems | |||
| Quantity | Unit | Quantity | Unit | |
| Moment of Inertia - J | kg-m² | Mass - m | kg | |
| Torque - τ | N-m | Force - f | N | |
| Angle - θ | rad | Length - l | m | |
Angular velocity -
![]() |
rad/sec | Velocity -
![]() |
m/s | |
Angular acceleration -
![]() |
rad/sec² | Acceleration -
![]() |
m/s² | |
| Spring Constant - Kr | N-m/rad | Spring Constant - k | N/m | |
| Friction Coefficient - Br | N-m-s/rad | Friction Coefficient - g | N-s/m | |
Note that the spring and friction elements for the rotating systems will use capital letters with a subscript r (Kr, Br), while the translating systems will use a lowercase letter.
One of the difficulties in working with rotating systems (as opposed to those that translate) is that there are often multiple ways to make diagrams of the systems. In examples below, a few alternatives are given; you should try to become comfortable with the multiple representations.
In rotating mechanical systems, the inertia elements are masses that rotate and are characterized by moment of inertia. The moment of inertia for some common shapes are given below.
| Shape | Image | Moment of Inertia, J |
| Cylinder, radius=r, mass=m Rotating about center axis |
|
|
| Solid Sphere,
radius=r, mass=m Rotating about center |
![]() |
|
| Uniform Rod, length=ℓ, mass=m Rotating about end |
|
|
| Uniform Rod, length=ℓ, mass=m Rotating about center |
|
|
| Mass at end of
massless rod, length=ℓ, mass=m Rotating about end |
![]() |
|
The relationship between torque, moment of inertia and angular acceleration is given by:
(Translating system equivalent:
)
A rotational spring is an element that is deformed (wound or unwound) in direct proportion to the amount of torque applied. Ideal springs have no inertia. The relationship between torque, spring constant and angle is given by:
(Translating system equivalent:
)
A photo of typical rotational springs is shown. You should be able to visualize how an applied torque to wind (or unwind) the spring would be opposed.

from: http://dudekbock.com/springs.html
A shaft connected between two elements can also act as a rotational spring. Click the start button to see an animation of a flexible shaft (i.e., rotational spring) that is fixed on the left but free to rotate on the right. Note how the shaft twists as the flywheel (with moment of inertia, J), turns (however the rotation doesn't slow because there is no friction).
In practice a rotational spring is drawn as a shaft (with an associated spring constant) or with the same symbol as a translating spring, but with the spring constant as a capital letter with a subscript. Both images below represent the system from the animation, with theta defined positive in the counterclockwise direction.
| Flexible Shaft | ![]() |
| Spring | ![]() |
As with the translating systems, friction is the most difficult of the three elements to model accurately and we will generally only consider viscous friction. The constitutive equation relating angular velocity, torque and friction coefficient is
(Translating system equivalent:
)
A rotation friction element often consists of an object moving in a fluid, very similar to the translating dashpot, but with a rotary motion. An example of such a device is used in some exercise equipment. The photo below shows an exercise trainer with a paddlewheel in liquid (the blue circular object). As you exercise, the vanes of the paddlewheel move against the fluid, creating a torque in resistance to your motion.

from:
http://www.firstdegreerowers.com/E-720-Cycle-Crosstrainer.asp
There are several ways of drawing these friction elements. Consider the animation shown below with one flywheel (J1) attached by a flexible shaft (Kr) to a wall (as before), but now there is a second flywheel (J2) that is driven by friction between the two flywheels (Br1), and friction to the stationary ground (Br2). J1 starts with an initial value, so it starts oscillating back and forth as the simulation begins. This drives J2, through Br1, but the energy in the system decays over time because energy is lost to the friction.
This system can be shown schematically in a few ways. In the first diagram below, the shaft is shown schematically as a spring, the friction Br1 is drawn as a dashpot, while the friction Br2 is shown as hash marks against ground. In the second diagram the shaft is not drawn as a spring but is shown to be a spring with the label Kr; both friction elements are shown as dashpots. It is important to be comfortable with both drawings (and others that could be drawn).
| Kr=Spring Br1=dashpot Br2=hashmarks |
![]() |
| Kr=Flexible Shaft Br1=dashpot Br2=dashpot |
|
Three elements were introduced, springs, friction elements and inertial elements (masses). An ideal linear spring has no mass and a linear relationship between force and elongation. For viscous friction there is a linear relationship between force and velocity. Friction may either be between two surfaces (depicted as hash marks) or between two objects (depicted as a dashpot). An ideal dashpot is also massless. Masses have a linear relationship between force and acceleration.
| Spring: | ![]() |
| Friction: | ![]() |
| Inertia: | ![]() |
© Copyright 2005-2013 Erik Cheever This page may be freely used for educational purposes.
Erik Cheever Department of Engineering Swarthmore CollegeContents
The discussions on this page follow closely, and draw on, the techniques used to model translating mechanical systems. It is assumed that you are familiar with those techniques. We can also combine translating and rotating systems as discussed here.
For rotating mechanical systems
(translating system equivalent:
)
If we consider the J·α term to be a torque, we are left with D'Alembert's law
(translating system equivalent)

We will call the J·α term D'Alembert's torque, or inertial torque. The inertial torque is always in a direction opposite to the defined positive direction.
Equations of motion for translating mechanical system depend on the application of D'Alembert's law. Using this principle we say that the sum of all torques on an object is equal to zero,

but we must also take the inertial torque (J·α) as one of these torques. This inertial torque is in the opposite direction from the defined positive direction.
We can apply D'Alembert's law to develop equations of motion for rotating mechanical systems through the use of free body diagrams. To do this we draw a free body diagram for each unknown position in a system. This is very similar to the way this was done for translating mechanical systems.
In the system shown one flywheel (J1) is attached by a flexible shaft (Kr) to ground (the unmoving wall) and has an applied torque, τa. A second flywheel (J2) is driven by friction between the two flywheels (Br1). The second flywheel also has friction to the ground (Br2). Derive equations of motion for the system shown.

Solution: First we must define our variables of motion. In this case there are two - the angles of the flywheel. It is generally a good idea to define the variables in the same direction, so we arbitrarily define them as positive in the counterclockwise direction.

We now create our free body diagrams
| Free body diagram at θ1 | Free body diagram at θ2 |
|
There are 4 torques acting:
|
There are 3 torques acting:
|
|
|
![]() |
|
It is possible to go directly from the system diagram to a state space model. Details are here system diagram to a state space model.
Thus far we have only developed the differential equations that represent a system. To solve the system, the model must be put into a more useful mathematical representation such as transfer function or state space. Details about developing the mathematical representation are here.
© Copyright 2005-2013 Erik Cheever This page may be freely used for educational purposes.
Erik Cheever Department of Engineering Swarthmore CollegeContents
Gears perform many functions, in this section we look at gears that increase or reduce angular velocity (while simultaneously decreasing or increasing torque, such that energy is conserved). In many ways gears act in rotating systems as do levers in translating systems. A picture of gears is shown below, along with a schematic representation.

photograph from:
http://www.geardesign.co.uk/spur-gears.htm
We will specify gears by their radii. When you buy gears you normally specify the number of teeth and the number of teeth per inch (or centimeter). These two measures are equivalent: the number of teeth and teeth per inch give the circumference, which in turn determines the radius. If the number of teeth are doubled, the radius is doubled.
If we consider two gears in equilibrium and in contact with each other, we can two very useful relationships.

First we note the geometric relationship that results from the path that the arc lengths along their circumference must be equal as the gears turn.

Since the arc lengths (shown with a heavy blue line) must be equal
r1θ1 = r2θ2 = arc length
If we had defined θ2 in the opposite direction, this expression would have a negative sign (r1θ1 = -r2θ2).
We derive a second relationship from a torque balance. Before we can do so we must define a force between the gears termed a "contact force." This force must be equal and opposite across the interface between the two gears, but its direction is arbitrary. We start by drawing free body diagrams with a contact force where the gears meet.

The contact force is tangent to both gears and so produces a torque that is equal to the radius times the force.

We can do a torque balance on each of the two gears
| Gear 1 | Gear 2 | |
![]() |
![]() |
We are not usually interested in fc, so we remove from the equations and we get

It is easy to show that the same relationship exists even if the contact forces are defined in the opposite direction (up on gear 1, down on gear 2).
In the system below, a torque, τa, is applied to gear 1 (with moment of inertia J1). It, in turn, is connected to gear 2 (with moment of inertia J2) and a rotational friction Br. The angle θ1 is defined positive clockwise, θ2 is defined positive clockwise. The torque acts in the direction of θ1.
Derive a differential equation for the system below in terms of θ1 (i.e., θ2 and fc should not be in the final result).
We start by drawing free body diagrams, including a contact force that we will arbitrarily choose to be down on J1 and up on J2. The directions of the reaction forces due to inertia and friction are chosen, as always, opposite to the defined positive direction.

We convert the force to a torque (note: we could have skipped the previous step and done this directly)

This yields the two equations of motion

We can easily solve for fc and eliminate it from the equations, but we also need to eliminate θ2. To do this we use the relationship between θ1 and θ2 (from equal arc lengths).
r1θ1 = -r2θ2
Note that we have a negative sign here because of the way θ1 and θ2 were defined (if θ1 moves in the positive direction, then θ2 is negative). When you use the arc length expression you must be careful of signs.
We can put this into the equation for J1 and solve (in standard form with the output (θ1) on the left, and the input (τa) on the right.

Note: the same result is obtained independent of the chosen direction for θ2 and fc.
The final result from the example is important deserves some notice. The multiplication of J2 and Br by the square of the ratio of the radii is a well known, and general phenomenon. If a load is attached to a system through gears, the perceived effect is multiplied by the square of the ratio of the radii. We can use this to our advantage to make a load appear smaller (if we have a weak driving torque - for example, a small motor). The reason bicycles have gears is so that the load perceived by the bicycle rider can be kept relatively constant even as s/he goes up or down hills.
Note that if we combine the geometric relationship

with the torque relationship,
the product of torque and velocity becomes:

You will see on the next web page that the product of angular velocity and torque is power. So the last equation simply states that power is preserved across a set of gears. The gears allow one to trade torque for angular velocity (i.e., if the gears are of unequal size, the larger gear will experience higher torque but lower angular velocity than the smaller gear).
While this document doesn't discuss pulleys directly, the concepts are closely related (i.e., you must perform a torque balance around the pivot). Pulleys are discussed here.
Systems that have parts that rotate and translate are handled in much the same way as with gears:
The process will be illustrated with an example.
Derive equations of motion for the system shown along with an expression relating horizontal position to angle of rotation. There is a force, fa, applied to a mass m. A uniform cylinder sits on top of the mass and is free to roll and translate, but it rolls without slipping.
First we need to define positions, in this case three of them. We need to define one for the position of the mass, m, and one for the angle through which the cylinder has turned about its center. We also need to define one for the lateral position of the cylinder.

Now we can draw free body diagrams (again, we need three), and write the equations of motion. Here we have taken fc to be to the right on m, and to the left on the cylinder. Torques are taken about the center of mass.
| Freebody diagram at x1 |
![]() |
![]() |
| Freebody around θ |
|
![]() |
| Freebody diagram at x2 |
![]() |
![]() (note: this uses mass of cylinder) |
The last thing we need is a relationship between position and arc length for the cylinder. In this case it is not so obvious, but is easily found with a little thought.
Therefore, by superposition
r·θ=x1-x2
When solving problems with gears, you always need to include two facts:
If you are not using both of these relationships, you probably won't be able to solve the problem.
The motion of an body can be separated into two independent component, translation and rotation. If an element both rotates and translates a separate freebody diagram is needed for each component.
© Copyright 2005-2013 Erik Cheever This page may be freely used for educational purposes.
Erik Cheever Department of Engineering Swarthmore CollegeThis section discusses energy and power in rotating mechanical systems. It is assumed you already know about energy and power in translating mechanical systems. Accordingly, this page is rather brief.
The potential energy, U, stored in a rotational spring with spring constant Kr that is wound to an angle θ is
(Translating system equivalent:
)
The kinetic energy, T, stored in a rotating mass with moment of inertia J and angular velocity ω is
(Translating system equivalent:
)
Dissipated energy in a friction element, Br, with angular velocity, ω, is given by
(Translating system equivalent:
)
Power in rotating systems is given by
(Translating system equivalent:
)
where τ is the torque and ω is the angular velocity.
Note: the previous page showed that power is conserved when there are gears in the system, but there is a tradeoff between angular velocity and torque.
© Copyright 2005-2013 Erik Cheever This page may be freely used for educational purposes.
Erik Cheever Department of Engineering Swarthmore College© Copyright 2005-2013 Erik Cheever This page may be freely used for educational purposes.
Erik Cheever Department of Engineering Swarthmore College