Transfer Function → State Space (order of numerator=order of denominator)

If the order of the numerator is equal to the order of the denominator, it becomes more difficult to convert from a system transfer function to a state space model.  This document shows how to do this for a 3rd order system.  The technique easily generalizes to higher order.

Controllable Canonical Form (CCF)

Consider the third order differential transfer function:

 

We start by multiplying by Z(s)/Z(s) and then solving for Y(s) and U(s) in terms of Z(s).  We also convert back to a differential equation.

 

We can now choose z and its first two derivatives as our state variables

 

Now we just need to form the output

Unfortunately, the third derivative of z is not a state variable or an input, so this is not a valid output equation.  However, we can represent the term as a sum of state variables and outputs:

and

From these results we can easily form the state space model:

 

In this case, the order of the numerator of the transfer function was less than that of the denominator.  If they are equal, the process is somewhat more complex.  A result that works in all cases is given below; the details are here.

Observable Canonical Form (OCF)

Consider the third order differential transfer function:

 

We can convert this to a differential equation and solve for the highest order derivative of y:

 

Now we integrate twice (the reason for this will be apparent soon), and collect terms according to order of the integral (this includes bringing the first derivative of u to the left hand side):

 

Without an justification we choose y-b0u as our first state variable

 

Looking at the right hand side of the differential equation we note that y=q1 and we call the two integral terms q2:


 

This isn't a valid state equation because it has "y" on the right side (recall that only state variables and inputs are allowed).  We can get rid of it by noting:

so

 

This is our first state variable equation. 

Now let's examine q2 and its derivative:

 

Again we note that y=q1+b0u and we call the integral terms q3:


This is our second state variable equation. 

Now let's examine q3 and its derivative:

 

This is our third, and last, state variable equation.

Our state space model now becomes:

 


Here is a good reference that does the same derivations from a different perspective: http://www.ece.rutgers.edu/~gajic/psfiles/canonicalforms.pdf

 


References

© Copyright 2005 to 2015 Erik Cheever    This page may be freely used for educational purposes.

Erik Cheever       Department of Engineering         Swarthmore College